Extradition by country

Extradition Lawyer in Constanta: Curtea de Apel Constanța and the Local Procedure

For a person located in Constanța or Tulcea County, the local court for an ordinary extradition request is generally Curtea de Apel Constanța (Constanța Court of Appeal), acting through its criminal section, with the attached Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Constanța (prosecutor’s office). The court decides whether the legal conditions for extradition are met; there is no single fixed end-to-end timetable, but the first steps and challenges have short statutory deadlines. A European Arrest Warrant from another EU Member State follows the separate surrender procedure, not ordinary extradition.

The court’s official presentation confirms that its district covers Constanța and Tulcea counties through Tribunalul Constanța and Tribunalul Tulcea. The place where a person is located determines the starting court route, subject to the special multi-person rule in Article 42(2). Verify the case number, applicable legal instrument and actual custody location before calculating any deadline.

Which Constanța court and prosecutor act first?

Article 42 of Law No. 302/2004 assigns passive extradition to the court of appeal and attached prosecutor for the district where the person was located. The criminal section does not retry the foreign offence.

Important Constanța exception: Article 42(2) sends the matter to Curtea de Apel București only when the requesting state seeks the extradition of two or more people at the same time, for the same criminal case or related cases, and those people have been located in different court-of-appeal districts. In that situation local prosecutorial work is transferred to Bucharest; Article 43(2) also permits a hearing by videoconference. A mere reference to a co-accused abroad does not itself shift the case.

InstitutionLocal role and verified detail
Curtea de Apel Constanța — Secția penală și pentru cauze penale cu minori și de familieDecides extradition and provisional arrest. Address: Palatul de Justiție, Strada Traian nr. 35C; criminal registry extension 178.
Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel ConstanțaLocal prosecutors receive Article 42 applications for persons found within the Constanța/Tulcea appellate district.
Romanian Ministry of JusticeNational central authority: checks international regularity and coordinates transmission and surrender.
Border Police Coast GuardMay first encounter a traveller at a port or border point; its directory lists local crossing points.

Normal court working hours are Monday–Friday, 08:00–16:00; the criminal-section archive lists public service 09:00–13:00 on those days, subject to published holiday arrangements. The official contact page confirms a duty clerk and judicial panel for urgent preventive-measure matters after hours and on weekends. It warns that the general administrative email is not for case filings and asks parties to telephone to confirm receipt of urgent procedural messages; a valid filing route and timestamp should be agreed with local counsel.

For an actual Constanța case, the court also publishes a separate criminal-section address for case documents; its filing instructions call for PDF attachments of no more than 12 MB per document. The general administrative email is not a substitute. Ask the registry to confirm the current authorised method and receipt, particularly for a deadline that expires outside public archive hours.

Does an arrest at the port, airport or land border change the court?

The first authority may differ, but territorial competence still follows the person’s location. The Border Police lists the Port of Constanța, Midia, Constanța Sud–Agigea and Mangalia, plus the land-border points Vama Veche and Negru Vodă. The county is also served by Mihail Kogălniceanu Constanța International Airport.

Record the unit, arrest time and place, case number and transfer destination. Border officers do not decide extradition. A Red Notice is a police alert, not an extradition judgment. Under Article 44(2) of Law No. 302/2004 a notice or diffusion can count as an emergency provisional-arrest request when the treaty expressly allows it or reciprocity exists; the statute also sets a narrowly framed serious-crime exception even without reciprocity. Articles 44(3)–(7) impose further conditions and require the prosecutor to refer a qualifying request to the court. The alert alone never decides surrender.

Article 44(3) expressly excludes people covered by Article 19 from arrest on the basis of an INTERPOL Red Notice or diffusion alone. Counsel should examine nationality, protection status and the particular Article 19 category before treating a notice as a lawful arrest request; the applicable treaty and other grounds must still be checked.

Ordinary extradition is under Title II of Law No. 302/2004; an EAW is a separate Title III surrender mechanism between EU Member States. For a non-EU request, check the applicable treaty or other lawful basis. If papers mention an EAW or the Schengen Information System, do not use ordinary-extradition deadlines without checking the separate route. See extradition versus EAW surrender.

The first 72 hours: a practical action plan, not a statutory deadline

There is no universal statutory “72-hour extradition hearing”. This is a practical checklist; legal periods run from their own triggers.

WhenAction
ImmediatelyConfirm identity, arrest location, authority, custody facility, interpreter, lawyer and whether the paper is an extradition request, provisional-arrest request, EAW or alert.
First dayObtain the detention record; send identity, citizenship, residence and urgent medical documents to counsel.
Days two–threeConfirm case number, next hearing and deadline. Arrange translations and gather identity, treaty and foreign-proceeding documents; do not wait for the full foreign file before seeking local help.

Article 43(1)’s 48 hours run from the prosecutor’s receipt of the formal request and attachments, not automatically from arrest. Separately, police/prosecutor detention (“reținere”) is capped at 24 hours; the criminal investigation body must present the person to the prosecutor within the first 10 hours (Article 45).

What happens at the first appearance?

At the first hearing, the person must have a free interpreter and appointed counsel if no lawyer has been chosen. The prosecutor must attend; proceedings are oral and adversarial, and public unless the person or prosecutor objects. After the examination the person may choose voluntary extradition under Article 47 or oppose the request; the court must check the consequences of consent and any legal impediment. A separate waiver of the speciality rule is possible but is not automatic. Seek legal advice before consenting, because the voluntary-extradition judgment is final.

For justified reasons, Article 46 allows up to eight additional days. Under Article 49 the person may oppose extradition orally and in writing and offer evidence; a reasoned written objection is due within eight days after the hearing, with no more than two defence witnesses. The objection is limited to mistaken identity or failure of the legal conditions for extradition, not a retrial of the foreign allegations. The prosecutor may ask a further eight days; evidence admitted by the court is taken within a maximum of 15 days under Article 50. These are distinct procedural periods, not an overall case deadline.

If the requesting state has supplied insufficient information, Articles 51 and 52(1)(b) allow the court to request further material and set a two-month period, potentially followed by a further two months. That is a conditional evidential adjournment, not a guaranteed postponement of the first hearing or an extension of an appeal deadline.

Where can the person be held, and how long?

  • Police/prosecutor detention: up to 24 hours under Article 45.
  • Emergency provisional arrest before the formal request: up to 40 days under Article 44(8), unless the applicable treaty provides longer. Release does not bar a later arrest if the formal request arrives.
  • Provisional arrest during the formal case: no more than 180 days in total under Article 43(3). The court must review the need for detention no later than every 30 days and may substitute house arrest, judicial control or bail where lawful.

Under Article 43(4), provisional extradition arrest is normally served in Interior Ministry remand facilities, except where the person is already serving a prison sentence. The court's official custody contact directory names both Centrul de Reținere și Arestare Preventivă al I.P.J. Constanța (telephone 0241 611 364, extension 20034) and the police remand centre of I.P.J. Tulcea (telephone 0240 506 755). These are two separate county facilities, not an assertion that a particular person is held at either one. Confirm the actual centre and visit arrangements through counsel and the responsible custodian before travelling.

What can the defence ask the local court to examine?

The court checks legal conditions, identity and statutory or treaty impediments. Article 52(2) bars it from retrying the merits of the foreign prosecution or conviction or deciding policy desirability. Identify the legal defect and support it with documents rather than trying the foreign case again in Constanța.

Gather identity documents, any record cancelling or changing the warrant or sentence, reliable information about the foreign proceedings and relevant medical records. Detailed refusal grounds belong to How to Stop Extradition from Romania; the national stages and treaty framework belong to Extradition from Romania.

Which challenge goes to Bucharest, and when?

Under Article 52(8), the person sought or prosecutor may challenge the ordinary-extradition decision within five days from pronouncement. The Criminal Section of the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (High Court of Cassation and Justice) in Bucharest hears it. Article 53 provides for a three-judge panel and a hearing within 10 days. Receipt of the written copy does not automatically start the clock.

A separate challenge to an order imposing, maintaining, replacing or ending provisional arrest is due within 48 hours from pronouncement (Article 43(9)); the file goes to the higher court within 48 hours and the challenge is decided within five days of registration. A challenge to an order imposing or maintaining arrest is not suspensive. A challenge to the final extradition decision suspends surrender, but not provisional arrest.

EAW challenges are governed separately by Title III. A constitutional complaint or ECtHR application is not an automatic extra appeal and does not replace the statutory challenge. Do not assume an external application suspends surrender; interim relief needs its own legal basis and decision.

What should family members and foreign counsel prepare?

  • Full name, date of birth, citizenship, passport details and spelling variants.
  • Arrest time/place, responsible unit, custody facility, case number and next hearing date.
  • All Romanian papers: detention order, court minute, rights notice, interpreter details and references to Law No. 302/2004 or an EAW.
  • Foreign warrant, charges, judgment, proof of finality, appeal decisions, remaining sentence or confirmation the warrant was withdrawn or replaced.
  • Certified translations if available, plus foreign counsel and consulate contacts. A consulate cannot replace defence counsel or direct the court.
  • Relevant evidence: citizenship/residence documents, limitation dates, medical records or proof of another proceeding about the same conduct.

Keep originals and record when each notice arrived and each decision was pronounced. Pronouncement may start a deadline before the family receives a copy. Send confidential papers securely to counsel, not publicly.

Hypothetical example: a stop at Constanța Sud–Agigea

Hypothetical: a traveller is stopped at Constanța Sud–Agigea on a foreign alert. The family should identify whether it is an EAW, formal extradition request or emergency provisional-arrest request, obtain the custody location and case number, contact counsel and ask whether the person has been brought before the local prosecutor and Curtea de Apel Constanța. The crossing point identifies where the person was found, not the legal route.

How this local page fits the national procedure

This page focuses on Constanța/Tulcea court routing, port/airport/border arrests, out-of-hours continuity and first-hearing deadlines. National refusal grounds and full treaty analysis are covered in the linked guides. Check the Council of Europe Treaty Office declarations and any bilateral treaty for the requesting state.

For a case-specific assessment, the site’s team can coordinate cross-border defence with local counsel. Send available papers and deadline information through the request page.

Frequently asked questions

Does a Red Notice mean automatic extradition?

No. It is a police-cooperation alert, not a court decision granting extradition. Its effect depends on Romanian law, the applicable treaty and the circumstances of any provisional-arrest request.

Can the Constanța court decide whether the foreign conviction was correct?

Not by retrying the foreign case. Article 52(2) excludes review of the merits of the foreign prosecution or conviction; the court examines the legal conditions and properly raised impediments.

Does the 48-hour period always run from arrest?

No. Article 43(1) runs from receipt of the formal extradition request and attachments. The separate police/prosecutor detention measure is capped at 24 hours under Article 45.

Sources

Last updated: 2026-10-28

Author: Razmik Khachatrian

International extradition & cross-border legal services · LEX EXTRADITION by Lex Agency LLC · Author profile