Extradition by country

Extradition Lawyer in Split: Županijski sud u Splitu and the Local Procedure

For conventional extradition requested by a non-EU state, if the person is found in Split, check Županijski sud u Splitu (Split County Court). A European Arrest Warrant (EAW) follows a different route: the receiving county prosecutor depends on residence or stay, or on the arrest location only if the person has neither in Croatia. Get a lawyer, interpreter and written detention documents before anyone consents to surrender.

Which Split institutions handle the first steps?

The official directory lists the court at Ivana Gundulića 29a, with a Criminal Department, investigating judges and an investigation registry. The Split County State Attorney’s Office (Županijsko državno odvjetništvo u Splitu), also at Gundulićeva 29a, states that its territorial jurisdiction matches the court’s area. For an EAW, Article 9’s residence/stay rule can direct intake elsewhere; confirm the actual assignment from the file.

Local institutionVerified detail and practical use
Županijski sud u SplituIvana Gundulića 29a. Criminal registry: room 126/1, +385 21 387 702, 07:00–15:00; no party reception on Wednesdays. Investigation registry: room 130a/I, +385 21 387 802.
Županijsko državno odvjetništvo u SplituGundulićeva 29a. Its territorial jurisdiction matches the Split County Court area.
Postaja aerodromske policije ResnikUlica dr. Franje Tuđmana 96, Kaštel Štafilić; +385 21 504 139. Its statutory area includes Split–Kaštela Airport and the associated border crossing.
Postaja pomorske policije SplitZrinsko-Frankopanska bb (Vojarna Sv. Nikole), Split; +385 21 354 689. Its duties include the Port of Split border crossing and maritime-border control in Split-Dalmatia County.
Zatvor u SplituDračevac 2c, Split; phone +385 21 246 740. This is a local facility to check if remand detention has been ordered, not proof that a particular person is held there.

Police may make the initial arrest, but their local unit does not decide surrender. For an EAW, the county prosecutor designated under Article 9 receives the warrant; the competent court decides judicial surrender.

Is this conventional extradition or a European Arrest Warrant?

Ask for the notice, warrant or request stating the legal basis. For a non-EU state’s request, Croatia’s Zakon o međunarodnoj pravnoj pomoći u kaznenim stvarima (Act on International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters) applies, subject to any controlling treaty. Article 45 routes the request through the Ministry to the court where the person resides or is found; for a person found in Split, that points to Županijski sud u Splitu, subject to the case file.

For conventional extradition, Article 48 says detention under an Article 44 provisional-arrest request may be revoked if the formal request is not submitted within 18 days of detention. A period set by the investigating judge for the request cannot exceed 40 days from detention; on the requesting state’s application, detention may be extended by up to 30 more days. Check the order and its trigger.

An EAW is a separate judicial surrender procedure between EU Member States. Under Croatia’s EU judicial-cooperation Act, Zakon o pravosudnoj suradnji u kaznenim stvarima s državama članicama Europske unije (NN 86/2026), Article 9 routes intake to the county prosecutor by residence or stay, or by arrest location only if the person has neither in Croatia. Split’s prosecutor covers the Split County Court area, but arrest in Split alone does not make it competent if the person resides or stays elsewhere. The Act took effect on 15 August 2026; Article 219 keeps the former Act for proceedings already pending then. Counsel must identify the applicable version before calculating deadlines. For national procedure and refusal grounds, see Extradition from Croatia and the Croatia remedies guide.

The Council of Europe Treaty Office lists the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 024) as in force for Croatia from 25 April 1995 and shows no Croatian reservation to the Convention itself. The applicable protocol and any bilateral treaty must still be checked for the requesting state.

What should happen in the first 72 hours?

This is a practical action plan, not a universal statutory 72-hour deadline. The clocks differ by legal route and by the documents available.

StageLegal timing or conditionPractical action
Immediately after arrestUnder NN 86/2026, police must transfer the person to the detention supervisor (pritvorski nadzornik) within 24 hours of arrest. If the required translation of the EAW or Schengen Information System (SIS) alert is missing, police must request it within 48 hours of arrest. If the prosecutor has neither an EAW accompanied by the required translation nor a legally sufficient SIS alert, detention may be ordered for up to 48 hours from arrest; if the translation has not arrived within that 48-hour period, an investigating judge may, on the prosecutor’s motion, extend detention by a further 36 hours.Record the arrest time, location, police unit and document number. Request counsel, an interpreter, medical help if needed, and notification of a chosen person or consulate.
After transfer to the detention supervisorThe prosecutor must question the person within 16 hours after transfer. If the prosecutor has the EAW and required translation, or a SIS alert meeting the statutory requirements, and orders no precautionary measures, police must bring the person before the investigating judge within 48 hours of arrest.Have counsel check identity, EAW/SIS material, translation, rights notice and detention basis. If the required documents are not received within the periods in Article 49(7)–(8), the person must be released. If they arrive later, police must rearrest the person and bring them before the investigating judge within 24 hours; the Article 62 decision clock then runs from the new arrest.
First judicial hearing in an EAW caseThe detention hearing cannot proceed without a defence lawyer; if the person has none, the court appoints one. In a contested surrender case, the court may request additional material and set a period of no more than 15 working days for it.Prepare the warrant, any judgment, identity and residence records, and concise evidence relevant to the person’s objections. Ask the interpreter to translate the decision and appeal instructions.

No universal 72-hour court-appearance rule applies to every conventional-extradition case; the order, applicable law and any other custody basis control.

Which decision can be appealed, and who hears the appeal?

For conventional extradition, Article 56 allows an appeal within three days of service of the order finding the legal conditions satisfied; the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia (Vrhovni sud Republike Hrvatske) hears it. A refusal is sent to that Court for review under Article 55, while Article 57 excludes an appeal against the Justice Minister’s later decision. For refusal grounds and remedies in detail, see the Croatia remedies guide.

Under NN 86/2026, distinguish the EAW appeal routes. If surrender was ordered with consent under Article 58(3), an appeal from an investigating judge’s order is heard by the same county court’s non-trial panel; an order made by that panel is reviewed by a panel of the higher court. If surrender is contested, Article 59(6) allows an appeal from the non-trial panel’s decision to a non-trial panel of the higher court. The appeal must be filed within three days of service of the written decision, and the reviewing panel decides within three days. For county-court criminal decisions, the higher court is the High Criminal Court of the Republic of Croatia (Visoki kazneni sud Republike Hrvatske). Under Article 90 of Croatia’s Criminal Procedure Act (Zakon o kaznenom postupku), the day of service is not counted; the period starts the next day. Keep proof of service and check the transition rule.

If surrender is contested, the decision period is 60 days from arrest, or from first questioning where no arrest occurred for justified reasons. If needed, the court must notify the issuing authority and explain a further period of 30 days; in exceptional circumstances it must notify Eurojust. These are decision periods, not automatic release dates. An extradition-eligibility appeal, EAW surrender appeal, detention challenge and constitutional complaint are different remedies.

Where may the person be held, and how can family make contact?

The Ministry lists Zatvor u Splitu at Dračevac 2c, phone +385 21 246 740. Its published page lists visits to adult remand detainees on Tuesdays and the first and third Sundays, 08:00–15:00. Confirm location, permission and current hours before travelling: police custody and court-ordered remand are different stages, and schedules can change.

The court’s criminal registry is room 126/1, normally open 07:00–15:00, but does not receive parties on Wednesdays; the investigation registry is room 130a/I. This does not extend deadlines or mean urgent work stops. If an appeal clock may be running, contact counsel rather than waiting for a registry visit. Record whether the first police contact was at Resnik Airport or the Port of Split.

What should the family or foreign lawyer prepare?

  • The person’s full name, date and place of birth, nationality, passport details and alternate spellings.
  • The exact arrest time and location: Split–Kaštela Airport, Port of Split, a road checkpoint or another address in the area.
  • Copies of the arrest record, detention order, EAW/SIS notice or provisional-arrest notice, formal extradition request and every decision served.
  • The language the person understands, whether an interpreter was requested, and any issue with the translation.
  • Urgent medical information, prescribed medication and accessibility needs.
  • Records that can be checked quickly: identity, residence, family ties, prior proceedings, sentence or time already served, and evidence that a warrant may have been withdrawn or corrected.
  • The foreign defence lawyer’s contact details and the consulate the person wants notified.

How does the Split route work in a hypothetical case?

Hypothetical: a traveller is stopped at Split–Kaštela Airport after an SIS alert linked to an EAW. The family should write down the arrest time and alert details, ask for a Croatian defence lawyer and interpreter, and have counsel check the 24-hour transfer, 16-hour questioning and conditional 48-hour court-referral steps under NN 86/2026—unless the transitional rule means the earlier statute applies. If the person was instead provisionally arrested on a non-EU state’s request, counsel should obtain the detention order and calculate the Article 48 period under the conventional-extradition statute. The two clocks must not be mixed.

What must be checked before the person consents?

Do not consent before a lawyer explains the consequences in a language the person understands. Consent to surrender and waiver of the speciality rule are separate decisions; when properly recorded, each is irrevocable under the applicable Croatian route. Ask counsel to explain exactly what will be recorded and obtain a copy of the record.

Questions families ask about an extradition case in Split

Does an INTERPOL Red Notice mean the court has ordered extradition?

No. A Red Notice is an international police alert, not itself a Croatian court order authorising extradition. The authorities must identify the underlying legal basis and apply the relevant procedure.

Will the person definitely be held at Zatvor u Splitu?

No. It is a local facility to check, but the actual location depends on the custody decision and arrangements. Confirm the location before travelling or sending items.

Can a relative appeal instead of the detained person?

Do not assume so. Standing and the appeal route depend on the decision and the applicable procedure. Give the written order to counsel immediately because some appeal periods are only three days.

Identify the route, obtain the written orders and calculate deadlines from the correct trigger. The site team coordinates cross-border defence with local counsel; use the request page to contact the team.

Sources and official local information

Last updated: 2026-10-27

Author: Razmik Khachatrian

International extradition & cross-border legal services · LEX EXTRADITION by Lex Agency LLC · Author profile