Extradition from Bosnia and Herzegovina: How the Procedure Works and What an Extradition Lawyer Does

The route depends on the requesting state, the treaty relationship, nationality and the stage reached. The main domestic statute is the Law on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina No. 53/09, as amended by No. 58/13. The English text cited below is a translation; the authoritative local-language text and the treaty applicable between the two states should be checked in every live case. This page gives general information, not individual legal advice. For a general cross-border overview, see How extradition works: from request to final decision.

Who decides: the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina or the Minister of Justice?

Under Article 36, the Ministry of Justice promptly sends the request to the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Prosecutor checks statutory compliance, asks the Ministry to obtain missing material if the file is incomplete, and promptly sends a complete file to the Court.

The Court’s preliminary-proceedings judge handles the initial appearance and custody; after hearing the prosecutor and defence, the judge may take investigative steps and send the file to a panel. The panel decides whether the legal conditions are met. A positive finding is not an order to surrender: after the statutory review route, the Minister of Justice decides whether to grant extradition. Articles 43–46 keep the judicial assessment and final executive decision separate.

An international arrest warrant is not the only starting point. Under Article 36(4), if the person was not detained under such a warrant, the Prosecutor must ask the Court to assess the extradition conditions and seek temporary custody if statutory grounds exist.

Which law and international agreement govern the request?

Bosnia and Herzegovina is not an EU Member State, so the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is not the surrender procedure to or from it. A request involving an EU country still requires identifying the treaty that binds both states; a treaty’s general status does not establish that it applies to this particular pair.

What happens after a foreign state submits a request?

This is the ordinary statutory route. A treaty may affect transmission or documents; there is no universal deadline for the whole case, so check the trigger for each time limit.

Two qualifications matter. If the person was already detained on another ground, Article 38(7) starts the extension period from the order for temporary custody. If the papers miss the court-set deadline, temporary custody must end, but the case may not: Article 54 lets the Court decide to carry out extradition proceedings despite the missed deadline, and Article 38(6) allows later extradition action if a request arrives. After release for expiry of the temporary-custody period, Article 38(8) bars another temporary-custody order; extradition custody may instead be ordered on a formal request if Article 39 grounds exist.

What must the requesting state prove, and which documents matter?

Article 33 allows extradition for prosecution or enforcement of a final prison sentence. The conduct must be criminal in both states (dual criminality). For prosecution, the offence must carry at least one year of imprisonment under both laws; for enforcement, at least four months of the final sentence or remaining term must be left. Check the applicable treaty.

Article 34 addresses nationality, asylum status when the request is made, territorial links to Bosnia and Herzegovina or its nationals, limitation periods, prior proceedings, identity and evidence. It also covers political or military offences, discriminatory prosecution or punishment, and death-penalty exposure unless the requesting state guarantees the penalty will not be imposed or carried out. Detailed refusal grounds belong on the separate guide to stopping extradition.

Unless the applicable treaty provides otherwise, Article 35 requires the file to include:

• material establishing identity, such as a precise description, photograph or fingerprints, and information about citizenship;
• the relevant provisions of the requesting state’s criminal law;
• for prosecution, the original or authenticated copy of an indictment, arrest warrant or equivalent order, identifying the alleged conduct and the person and giving supporting evidence;
• for enforcement of a sentence, the original or authenticated copy of the judgment and information showing the sentence or remaining term;
• a certified translation of the request and supporting papers into one of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s official languages, unless an applicable international agreement provides otherwise.

If a passport and warrant identify different people, raise the discrepancy with counsel; it may be more than a spelling error. A translated label for the alleged offence alone is not enough to assess dual criminality. The facts alleged and the relevant provisions of both states’ criminal law matter.

What if the person is a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina or has dual nationality?

Articles 34(a) and 40 generally prevent extradition of a BiH citizen unless a treaty allows extradition of nationals. When nationality is identified, Article 40 provides for notification through the requesting state’s INTERPOL channel and INTERPOL’s General Secretariat; the requesting state may be told it can seek transfer of the prosecution to BiH authorities.

Provide a citizenship certificate, identity documents and records of any change or restoration of citizenship. A second passport does not decide the issue: counsel must check the treaty and any exception. If the Court later establishes BiH nationality that was not identified earlier, Article 40(5) provides for immediate release where local authorities cannot take over the prosecution and no other lawful basis for transfer exists. The EAW creates no automatic exception.

This exception has practical significance. The Ministry of Justice’s bilateral-agreements register lists extradition instruments with Croatia (in force 6 March 2014), Montenegro (30 June 2015), North Macedonia (10 January 2007; amended 30 July 2014), Serbia (2 December 2014) and Slovenia (18 February 2006). Article 40 expressly leaves room for treaty exceptions to the nationality rule, so the requesting state and the applicable treaty must be identified before deciding what Article 34(a) means in an individual case. Check the treaty text, amendments, covered offences and temporal scope; do not assume that either the domestic bar or a treaty exception applies to every offence or date.

Does arrest on an INTERPOL Red Notice mean extradition is approved?

No. An international warrant or INTERPOL notice may prompt police action, but it is neither the Court’s finding nor the Minister’s final decision. Obtain the notice and arrest details and distinguish the alert from the formal request and evidence. See how to check an INTERPOL Red Notice and the guide to Red Notices, diffusions and CCF requests.

Can a person consent to simplified extradition?

Article 52 allows consent to surrender through a simplified procedure without full extradition proceedings. The preliminary judge must explain the option and its effects. The Court records the consent and any waiver of speciality; the record must state that the person is not a BiH national and be signed by that person. Article 52(4) makes both consent and waiver irrevocable under domestic law. The Treaty Office lists no BiH declaration under Article 4(5) of the Third Additional Protocol allowing revocation. Where that Protocol applies, consent must also be voluntary and informed, with the right to counsel and an interpreter if necessary. Check the treaty pair and declarations.

The formal request may not be required in the simplified route: the Court sends the record to the Ministry and the Minister decides. Article 52(6) applies extradition-custody rules to further custody, and paragraph (7) gives simplified extradition the same legal effects and requirements as ordinary extradition. Consent and waiver of speciality are separate choices. Speciality generally limits later prosecution or punishment to the matters for which surrender was granted. Article 48 also addresses earlier offences, a more severe sentence including the death penalty, retrial after a trial in absentia and onward extradition. Because Article 52 permits a waiver while Article 48 lists conditions for the Minister’s decision, the effect of any waiver must be checked against the applicable treaty and the actual decision; do not assume it removes every restriction. Ask counsel to explain both choices before signing.

What if several states request the person, or surrender is postponed?

Articles 47 and 49 matter if proceedings or a prison sentence are pending in Bosnia and Herzegovina, or if several states request the same person. The Minister may postpone surrender while the person is prosecuted or serving a sentence in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Temporary surrender for urgent procedural steps is possible only if it will not harm domestic proceedings and the requesting state guarantees continued custody and return at the time set by the Minister on the Court’s proposal. For competing requests, the Minister weighs the seriousness and place of the offences, request dates, nationality, prospects for social rehabilitation and possible onward extradition. For the same or similar offences, extradition may also be granted for offences that individually fall below Article 33’s penalty thresholds. Under Article 50, the requesting state cannot hand the person to a third state without Bosnia and Herzegovina’s consent following the statutory procedure. Article 53 allows renewed extradition if a person returns to Bosnia and Herzegovina after evading prosecution or sentence in the requesting state; a renewed request is required, but supporting documents need not be resubmitted. Transit through Bosnia and Herzegovina is a separate treaty question: where Article 21 of the European Convention on Extradition applies between the relevant states, verify the transit request and treaty conditions. Transit permission is not a decision on extradition from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

What does an extradition lawyer do at each stage?

At the start, counsel identifies the treaty, obtains custody and request papers, checks the warrant’s identity details, arranges translations and records the dates of arrest, hearings and decisions. Custody lawfulness and duration are reviewed separately from the merits.

At the Court stage, counsel checks Article 35 documents, dual criminality and Article 33 thresholds, nationality, asylum status, related BiH proceedings and treaty conditions. Interpretation and medical needs should be recorded, and the client should understand the distinction between custody, the Court’s legal assessment and the Minister’s decision.

Before handover, counsel checks the Minister’s decision and Article 51 timetable. Under Article 55, if an Article 34 circumstance changes after the Court’s final decision but before the Minister decides, the file returns to the Court for new proceedings. If it changes after the Minister’s decision but before surrender, the Minister must rescind the decision and refer the matter back. A new document does not automatically stop transfer; its legal significance must be assessed.

Hypothetical example: a foreign national is arrested in Sarajevo on an international warrant, but the full extradition request has not arrived. Counsel records when custody began, obtains the judge’s order and checks the court-set deadline for the request and supporting papers, subject to Article 38’s maximum of 40 days. If the papers do not arrive, temporary custody must be terminated, but counsel must also consider Article 54 and the possibility of later proceedings or a new custody decision. Release from temporary custody does not by itself determine whether the legal conditions for extradition are met.

What should the person and family prepare now?

• The arrest record, custody decision, court notices and the date each document was received.
• All passports, identity cards, citizenship certificates and documents explaining any variation in the spelling of a name.
• Any foreign arrest warrant, indictment, judgment, calculation of the sentence remaining to be served and translations already supplied.
• Proof of any current or previous asylum claim in Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the filing date and any decision.
• Information about any related case, sentence, investigation or final decision in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
• Medical records or urgent treatment information relevant to detention or safe transfer, with a short explanation of why it matters.
• A reliable family contact and the details of counsel already instructed in the requesting state.

Contact counsel even if the file is incomplete. Share available papers, identify what is missing and preserve originals. Foreign counsel can coordinate with counsel in Bosnia and Herzegovina, but local steps and short deadlines require prompt attention.

What appeal or human-rights route may exist after the Court’s decision?

A positive judicial finding has a statutory appeal route, while a negative finding is reviewed separately under Article 45. Article 46(2) states that the Minister’s final decision cannot be appealed or challenged in an administrative dispute. A constitutional appeal or application to the European Court of Human Rights may require a separate assessment of admissibility and exhaustion of remedies; neither should be assumed to suspend surrender automatically. Detailed refusal grounds, challenge deadlines and interim measures belong on the separate remedies page. Extradition is also distinct from immigration removal or deportation; see extradition versus deportation.

How long does the whole process take?

The cited provisions set no universal end-to-end deadline. Timing depends on the request, treaty, custody, review and the Minister’s decision. Key periods are up to 40 days total for temporary custody, no more than six months for extradition custody under Article 39, three days from receipt to appeal a positive finding, and the Article 51 handover periods. Keep every order and record its receipt date.

The site’s team coordinates cross-border defence with local counsel. To discuss a matter, use the case enquiry form.